—— 要投稿,上万维,轻松学术交流

严正声明

本站非期刊官网,非中介代理,
不向作者收取任何费用!
举报微信:13140028228 冯老师

态度公正、信息求实、投稿自助、使用免费
中国农业经济评论(英文)(China Agricultural Economic Review)(国际刊号)
国际号刊 - 季刊
  • 中国农业经济评论(英文)(China Agricultural Economic Review)(国际刊号)
  • 复合影响因子:0
  • AMI核心国际刊(2022)
  • 知网外文库,维普目次
  •  
  投稿方式:官网投稿
  • 栏目频次
  • 一作占比
  • 单位占比
  • 热词

中频栏目

50.0%期平均发文量10篇
50.0%期平均发文量10篇
暂无一作信息.
暂无单位信息.
暂无关键词信息.
  • 更多

    期刊简介

  • 《中国农业经济评论(英文)》(China Agricultural Economic Review)(季刊),于2008年由中国农业大学和英国Emerald出版集团联合创办并向全球公开发行的一本英文国际学术季刊。该杂志旨在发表可应用于中国农业和农村决策过程、农业经济学学科发展以及希望借鉴中国农业和农村发展的发展中国家的研究。

  • 基本信息

  • 期刊名称:中国农业经济评论(英文)(China Agricultural Economic Review)(国际刊号)
  • 主管单位:
  • 主办单位:中国农业大学
  • 国内刊号:无CN刊号
  • 国际刊号:ISSN 1756-137X;EISSN 1756-1388
  • 出刊日期:
    期刊定价:
  • 邮发代码:
  • 所在省区:北京
    邮政编码:
  • 联系地址:

  • 投稿信息

  • 学科分类:农业经济
    版面费用:待核实
  • 字数要求:0
    查重要求:-
  • 复合因子:0
    综合因子:0
  • 审  稿 费:待核实
    稿费:待核实
  • 本刊可发:
  • 特殊属性:外文期刊

  • 联系方式

  • 投稿网址:https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/caer
  • 官网网址:https://caer.cau.edu.cn/
  • 电话传真:010-62738685(官网电话)
  • 电子邮箱:caer@cau.edu.cn(官网邮箱)
  • 微信公众号:CAER编辑部

审稿时间:暂无参考数据,审稿时间不确定!

投稿难度:网友分享,仅供参考

见刊周期:-

温馨提示以上只是参考信息,实际情况会根据投稿主题、稿件质量和数量、审稿流程有所差异。想获得更准确信息请联系期刊的编辑部进行咨询。

欢迎点评!让信息更透明,使投稿更轻松!
    • 审稿时间:
      是否录用:
    • 发表排期:
      查重要求:
    • 有无课题:
      有无回复:
    • 我的学历:
      我的职称:
    • 审稿费用:
      版面费用:
    • 稿       费:
      稿件字数:
    • 投稿难度:
    • 该刊可发:
    • 投稿主题:
匿名: 验证码: 点击切换验证码
    • 1、该刊只有国际刊号。

      2、投稿方式:在线投稿。

      3、官网网址:

      https://caer.cau.edu.cn/

      https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/caer

      4、投稿系统:

      https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/caer

      5、主办单位相关网址:

      https://www.cau.edu.cn/xkky/xsky/xxzb/index.htm

      (中国农业大学学术期刊)

      6、官网电话:010-62738685

      7、官网邮箱:caer@cau.edu.cn

      8、出刊日期:季刊,一年出版4期。

      9、官网微信公众号:CAER编辑部

      2026年1月29日星期四

      Author guidelines

      【官网信息】

      Before you start

      For

      queries relating to the status of your paper pre decision, please

      contact the Editor or Journal Editorial Office. For queries post

      acceptance, please contact the Supplier Project Manager. These details

      can be found in the Editorial Team section.

      Author responsibilities

      Our

      goal is to provide you with a professional and courteous experience at

      each stage of the review and publication process. There are also some

      responsibilities that sit with you as the author. Our expectation is

      that you will:

      Respond swiftly to any queries during the publication process.

      Be

      accountable for all aspects of your work. This includes investigating

      and resolving any questions about accuracy or research integrity.

      Treat communications between you and the journal editor as confidential until an editorial decision has been made.

      Read about our research ethics for authorship. These state that you must:

      Include

      anyone who has made a substantial and meaningful contribution to the

      submission (anyone else involved in the paper should be listed in the

      acknowledgements).

      Exclude anyone who hasn’t contributed to the paper, or who has chosen not to be associated with the research.

      In

      accordance with COPE’s position statement on AI tools, Large Language

      Models cannot be credited with authorship as they are incapable of

      conceptualising a research design without human direction and cannot be

      accountable for the integrity, originality, and validity of the

      published work. The author(s) must describe the content created or

      modified as well as appropriately cite the name and version of the AI

      tool used; any additional works drawn on by the AI tool should also be

      appropriately cited and referenced. Standard tools that are used to

      improve spelling and grammar are not included within the parameters of

      this guidance. The Editor and Publisher reserve the right to determine

      whether the use of an AI tool is permissible.

      If

      your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have

      considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your

      research, and include this information as part of your submission. Find

      out more about informed consent.

      Emerald’s Policy on AI Usage

      Emerald’s overarching principles of AI usage:

      1) Authors and peer reviewers are responsible and accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work.&

      2) AI tools and technology must be used responsibly and transparently.

      3) AI tools and technology should not replace human involvement in the publication process but instead supplement it.

      Copywriting

      (creating, drafting, or writing) any part of a submission using

      generative AI tools and technology to generate new material is not

      permitted.

      Copy-editing

      (correcting, editing, formatting, modifying, or refining) all or part

      of an author’s own original existing work using generative AI tools and

      technology the content to improve its structure and the clarity of the

      language and grammar is permitted, ensuring users adhere to the

      following overarching principles.

      Emerald’s full policy, including examples of use cases can be found on our Publishing Ethics page.

      Research and publishing ethics

      Our

      editors and employees work hard to ensure the content we publish is

      ethically sound. To help us achieve that goal, we closely follow the

      advice laid out in the guidelines and flowcharts on the COPE (Committee

      on Publication Ethics) website.

      We

      have also developed our research and publishing ethics guidelines. If

      you haven’t already read these, we urge you to do so – they will help

      you avoid the most common publishing ethics issues.

      A few key points:

      Any

      manuscript you submit to this journal should be original. That means it

      should not have been published before in its current, or similar, form.

      Exceptions to this rule are outlined in our pre-print and conference

      paper policies.  If any substantial element of your paper

      has been previously published, you need to declare this to the journal

      editor upon submission. Please note, the journal editor may use Crossref

      Similarity Check to check on the originality of submissions received.

      This service compares submissions against a database of 49 million works

      from 800 scholarly publishers.

      Your

      work should not have been submitted elsewhere and should not be under

      consideration by any other publication.Failure to comply with this may

      result in your work being desk-rejected by the journal editorial office.

      If

      you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it upon submission;

      this allows the editor to decide how they would like to proceed. Read

      about conflict of interest in our research and publishing ethics

      guidelines.

      By submitting your work to Emerald, you are guaranteeing that the work is not in infringement of any existing copyright.

      If

      you have written about a company/individual/organisation in detail

      using information that is not publicly available, have spent time within

      that company/organisation, or the work features named/interviewed

      employees, you will need to clear permission by using the consent to

      publish form; please also see our permissions guidance for full details.

      If you have to clear permission with the

      company/individual/organisation, consent must be given either by the

      named individual in question or their representative, a board member of

      the company/organisation, or a HR department representative of the

      company/organisation.

      You

      have an ethical obligation and responsibility to conduct your research

      in adherence to national and international research ethics guidelines,

      as well as the ethical principles outlined by your discipline and any

      relevant authorities, and to be transparent about your research methods

      in such a way that all involved in the publication process may fairly

      and appropriately evaluate your work. For all research involving human

      participants, you must ensure that you have obtained informed consent,

      meaning that you must inform all participants in your work (or their

      legal representative) as to why the research is being conducted, whether

      their anonymity is protected, how their data will be stored and used,

      and whether there are any associated risks from participation in the

      study; the submitted work must confirm that informed consent was

      obtained and detail how this was addressed in accordance with our policy

      on informed consent.

      Where

      appropriate, you must provide an ethical statement within the submitted

      work confirming that your research received institutional and national

      (or international) ethical approval, and that it complies with all

      relevant guidelines and regulations for studies involving humans,

      whether that be data, individuals, or samples. Specifically, the

      statement should contain the name and location of the institutional

      ethics reviewing committee or review board, the approval number, the

      date of approval, and the details of the national or international

      guidelines that were followed, as well as any other relevant

      information. You should also include details of how the work adheres to

      relevant consent guidelines along with confirming that informed consent

      was secured for all participants. The details of these statements should

      ensure that author and participant anonymity is not compromised. Any

      work submitted without a suitable ethical statement and details of

      informed consent for all participants, where required, will be returned

      to the authors and will not be considered further until appropriate and

      clear documentation is provided. Emerald reserves the right to reject

      work without sufficient evidence of informed consent from human

      participants and ethical approval where required.

      ......

      更多详见:

      https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/caer?id=caer#editorial-team


    验证码: 点击切换验证码