1、投稿方式：在线投稿。

2、刊内网址：（202302期）

https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/nano-materials-science

http://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/nmsci（投稿系统）

3、期刊主页：

http://www.keaipublishing.com/en/journals/nano-materials-science/

4、出刊日期：季刊，逢季末月出版。

2023年8月9日星期三

《纳米材料科学（英文版）》作者指南

（Nano Materials Science）

【官网信息】

Guide for Authors

INTRODUCTION

On submission

On submission

When you submit your manuscript to the Nano Materials Science, please provide the following.

Article text as a Word, PDF;

Numbered figures either included within or at the end of the text;

A cover letter, including a statement of the importance of the work

A list of preferred reviewers; these should be entered in the manuscript submission system

Any electronic supplementary information (ESI)

Any CCDC numbers, as well as CheckCIF files for each crystal structure; see the experimental data section for more information

The

submission system allows for up to five files to be uploaded at once.

Alternatively a ZIP file containing up to 20 files can be uploaded. All

files relating to a single manuscript should be uploaded simultaneously

during one transaction.

At revision

As

well as your revised manuscript, you will be asked to provide a

response to the referees, your figures as separate high-resolution files

and a table of contents entry. Full details of what you should include

will be sent to you by the editor when required.

Licence to publish

Corresponding

authors are required to agree to a licence to publish after their

article is accepted for publication. Alternatively, a downloadable PDF

version is available, which can be completed and returned by email or

post to the editorial office.

BEFORE YOU BEGIN

Policies

Initial assessment of submissions

We

are committed to publishing high quality new work that makes a

significant contribution within the scope of the journal. In order to

meet this aim, submitted manuscripts undergo initial evaluation by an

editor to ensure that they meet essential criteria for publication in

the journal.

Only

those manuscripts that pass this initial review process will be

forwarded to reviewers for further consideration. This process provides a

rapid decision to authors of those papers that are unsuccessful and

reduces the burden on the reviewers. A manuscript may be returned to the

author(s) without external review if, in the opinion of the editor(s),

one or more of the following apply:

the manuscript clearly falls outside the scope of the journal

the work is of poor scientific quality such that it is clearly not suitable for publication in a scientific journal

the manuscript is of insufficient general interest for the journal and would be better suited to a more specialised journal

the novelty of the work falls below that required for the journal

the manuscript represents undue fragmentation of the research into multiple papers

the

manuscript contains redundant information or significant amounts of

material that has already been published elsewhere or is under

consideration by another journal

the quality of the English in the manuscript is so poor as to render the science presented unclear

the

manuscript has already been reviewed and rejected by a different

journal, and the author(s) have made little or no attempt to address the

advice that the editor and/or referees have provided already.

the conclusions drawn by the manuscript are well known or have been published previously.

Similarity Check

Through

Similarity Check, we use the iThenticate software to detect instances

of overlapping and similar text in submitted or published manuscripts.

By

depositing all of our content in the Similarity Check database we allow

other Similarity Check members to screen their submissions against our

published articles.

Further details on our plagiarism policies can be found in our Author responsibilities section.

Ethics in publishing

For

information on Ethics in Publishing and Ethical guidelines for journal

publication see https://www.elsevier.com/publishingethics and

https://www.elsevier.com/ethicalguidelines

CONFLICT_OF_INTEREST

All

authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of

interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with

other people or organizations within three years of beginning the

submitted work that could inappropriately influence, or be perceived to

influence, their work. See also

https://www.elsevier.com/conflictsofinterest

Author’s responsibility

Authorship

There

is no universally agreed definition of authorship, but authors should,

as a minimum, take responsibility for a particular section of the study.

The award of authorship should balance intellectual contributions to

the conception, design, analysis and writing of the study against the

collection of data and other routine work. If there is no task that can

reasonably be attributed to a particular individual, then that

individual should not be credited with authorship.

All

authors must take public responsibility for the content of their paper.

The multidisciplinary nature of much research can make this difficult,

but this may be resolved by the disclosure of individual contributions.

Authors

have a responsibility to give due acknowledgement to all workers

contributing to the work. Those who have contributed significantly to

the research should be listed as co-authors. On submission of the

manuscript, the corresponding author attests to the fact that those

named as co-authors have agreed to its submission for publication and

accepts (accept) the responsibility for having properly included all

(and only) co-authors. If there are more than 10 co-authors on the

manuscript then the corresponding author should provide a statement to

specify the contribution of each co-author.

The

corresponding author signs a 'licence to publish' on behalf of all the

authors. Any change in authorship after initial submission must be

approved by all authors and justified to the editor.

In

the case of authorship disputes, authors are encouraged to reach a

mutual agreement. If this is not possible, unresolved disputes should be

referred to the responsible research institution(s) for mediation. The

Nano Materials Science cannot act as an adjudicator to determine correct

authorship.

Please

carefully check the spelling and format of all author names,

affiliations and funding information. If your paper is accepted for

publication, it is important that this information is accurate to ensure

your article is correctly indexed, which may affect citations and

future funding evaluation.

Authenticity and professionalism

Authors have responsibilities as detailed below.

Gather

and interpret data in an honest way: Editors, reviewers, readers and

publishers have the right to assume that submitted (and published)

manuscripts do not contain scientific dishonesty and/or fraud comprising

among others fictitious or manipulated data, plagiarised material

(either from the previous work of the authors or that of other persons),

reference omissions, false priority statements, 'hidden' multiple

publication of the same data and incorrect authorship. Authors must not

breach any copyright.

When

reproducing figures and/or schemes from previous publications, it is

the author's responsibility to seek appropriate permission from the

relevant publishers.

Present a concise and accurate report of their (your) research and an objective discussion of its significance.

……

更多详情：

http://www.keaipublishing.com/en/journals/nano-materials-science/guide-for-authors/