期刊语言：英语

出版地区：丹麦

万维提示

1、投稿方式：在线投稿。

2、期刊网址：

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1600051x

3、投稿网址：

https://wiley.atyponrex.com/journal/JCPE

4、官网邮箱：cpeedoffice@wiley.com（编辑部）

5、期刊刊期：月刊，一年出版12期。

2021年7月19日星期一

投稿须知【官网信息】

Author Guidelines

Journal of Clinical Periodontology now offers Free Format submission for a simplified and streamlined submission process. Read more here.

1. SUBMISSION

New submissions should be made via the Research Exchange submission portal https://wiley.atyponrex.com/journal/JCPE. Should your manuscript proceed to the revision stage, you will be directed to make your revisions via the same submission portal. You may check the status of your submission at anytime by logging on to submission.wiley.com and clicking the “My Submissions” button. For technical help with the submission system, please review our FAQs or contact submissionhelp@wiley.com.

Data protection

By submitting a manuscript to or reviewing for this publication, your name, email address, and affiliation, and other contact details the publication might require, will be used for the regular operations of the publication, including, when necessary, sharing with the publisher (Wiley) and partners for production and publication. The publication and the publisher recognize the importance of protecting the personal information collected from users in the operation of these services, and have practices in place to ensure that steps are taken to maintain the security, integrity, and privacy of the personal data collected and processed. You can learn more at https://authorservices.wiley.com/statements/data-protection-policy.html.

Preprint policy

Please find the Wiley preprint policy here.

This journal accepts articles previously published on preprint servers.

Journal of Clinical Periodontology will consider for review articles previously available as preprints. Authors may also post the submitted version of a manuscript to a preprint server at any time. Authors are requested to update any pre-publication versions with a link to the final published article.

For help with submissions, please contact: cpeedoffice@wiley.com 

2. AIMS AND SCOPE

The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide a platform for the exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and members of the academic community.

The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but serves an international audience by publishing contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. The journal accepts a broad spectrum of original work characterized as clinical or preclinical, basic or translational, as well as authoritative reviews, and proceedings of important scientific workshops. The journal’s scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontal and peri-implant tissues, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and peri-implant tissue healing and regeneration, the diagnosis, etiology, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions, the association of periodontal infection/inflammation and general health, and the clinical aspects of comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontitis-affected patient.

3. MANUSCRIPT CATEGORIES AND REQUIREMENTS

Journal of Clinical Periodontology publishes original research articles, reviews, clinical innovation reports and case reports. The latter will be published only if they provide new fundamental knowledge and if they use language understandable to the clinician. It is expected that any manuscript submitted represents unpublished original research.

i. Original Research Articles

Original Research articles must describe significant and original experimental observations and provide sufficient detail so that the observations can be critically evaluated and, if necessary, repeated. Original articles will be published under the heading of clinical periodontology, implant dentistry or pre-clinical sciences and must conform to the highest international standards in the field.

Word limit: 3,500 words maximum, excluding references.

Abstract: 200 words maximum; must be structured, under the sub-headings: Aim(s), Materials and methods, Results, Conclusion(s).

Figures/Tables: Total of no more than 7 figures and tables.

Introduction: should be focused, outlining the historical or logical origins of the study and not summarize the results; exhaustive literature reviews are not appropriate. It should close with the explicit statement of the specific aims of the investigation.

Material and Methods: must contain sufficient detail such that, in combination with the references cited, all clinical trials and experiments reported can be fully reproduced. As a condition of publication, authors are required to make materials and methods used freely available to academic researchers for their own use. This includes antibodies and the constructs used to make transgenic animals, although not the animals themselves.

Results: should present the observations with minimal reference to earlier literature or to possible interpretations.

Discussion: may usefully start with a brief summary of the major findings, but repetition of parts of the abstract or of the results section should be avoided. The discussion section should end with a brief conclusion and a comment on the potential clinical relevance of the findings. Statements and interpretation of the data should be appropriately supported by original references.

The discussion may usefully be structured with the following points in mind (modified from the proposal by Richard Horton (2002), The Hidden Research Paper, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2775-2778). Not all points will apply to all studies and its use is optional, but we believe it will improve the discussion section to keep these points in mind.

Summary of key finding

Primary outcome measure(s)

Secondary outcome measure(s)

Results as they relate to a prior hypothesis

Strengths and Limitations of the Study

Study Question

Study Design

Data Collection

Analysis

Interpretation

Possible effects of bias on outcomes

Interpretation and Implications in the Context of the Totality of Evidence

Is there a systematic review to refer to?

If not, could one be reasonably done here and now?

What this study adds to the available evidence

Effects on patient care and health policy

Possible mechanisms

Controversies Raised by This Study Future Research Directions

For this particular research collaboration

Underlying mechanisms

Clinical research

ii. Clinical Innovation Reports

Clinical Innovation Reports are suited to describe significant improvements in clinical practice such as the report of a novel surgical technique, a breakthrough in technology or practical approaches to recognized clinical challenges. They should conform to the highest scientific and clinical practice standards.

Word limit: 3,000 words maximum, excluding references.

Main text: should be organized with Introduction; Clinical Innovation Report; Discussion and Conclusion.

Figures/Tables: Total of no more than 12 figures and tables.

iii. Case Reports

Case Reports illustrating unusual and clinically relevant observations are acceptable, but their merit needs to provide high priority for publication in the Journal. On rare occasions, completed cases displaying non-obvious solutions to significant clinical challenges will be considered.

Main text: should be organised with Introduction; Case report; Discussion and Conclusion.

iv. Reviews and Systematic Reviews

Reviews are selected for their broad general interest; all are refereed by experts in the field who are asked to comment on issues such as timeliness, general interest and balanced treatment of controversies, as well as on scientific accuracy. Reviews should take a broad view of the field rather than merely summarizing the authors´ own previous work, so extensive citation of the authors´ own publications is discouraged.

Wherever possible, reviews should be constructed and submitted as Systematic Reviews, or at the very least provide robust descriptions of the methods that would allow readers to reproduce these. The use of state-of-the-art evidence-based systematic approaches is expected.

Reviews are frequently commissioned by the editors and, as such, authors are encouraged to submit a proposal to the Journal. Review proposals should include a full-page summary of the proposed contents with key references.

Note: For Systematic Reviews, the Journal adheres to the PRISMA reporting guidelines - PRISMA checklists should be included in submissions.

Word limit: 4,000 words maximum, excluding references.

Main text: should be organized with Introduction; Review; Discussion and Conclusion.

Revisions and Resubmissions

Please note that all revisions and resubmissions of papers should also include a separate rebuttal and a tracked changes document to assist in peer review.

4. PREPARING THE SUBMISSION

Free Format submission

Journal of Clinical Periodontology now offers Free Format submission for a simplified and streamlined submission process.

Before you submit, you will need:

Your manuscript: this can be a single file including text, figures, and tables, or separate files – whichever you prefer. All required sections should be contained in your manuscript, including a title page with all author details, including affiliations and email addresses, a statement of clinical relevance, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and conclusions. Figures and tables should have legends. References may be submitted in any style or format, as long as it is consistent throughout the manuscript. If the manuscript, figures or tables are difficult for you to read, they will also be difficult for the editors and reviewers. If your manuscript is difficult to read, the editorial office may send it back to you for revision.

(Why is this important? We need to make sure your manuscript is suitable for review.)

Statements relating to our ethics and integrity policies:

Conflict of interest disclosure

Statement of funding source

Ethical approval statement

Patient consent statement  (if appropriate)

permission to reproduce material from other sources

A separate Conflict of Interest form for each author.

(Why is this important? We need to uphold rigorous ethical standards for the research we consider for publication.)

Your co-author details, including affiliation and email address. (Why is this important? We need to keep all co-authors informed of the outcome of the peer review process.)

An ORCID ID, freely available at https://orcid.org. (Why is this important? Your article, if accepted and published, will be attached to your ORCID profile. Institutions and funders are increasingly requiring authors to have ORCID IDs.)

To submit, login at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jcpe and create a new submission. Follow the submission steps as required and submit the manuscript.

If you are invited to revise your manuscript after peer review, the journal will also request the revised manuscript to be formatted according to journal requirements as described below.

Cover Letters

Cover letters are not mandatory; however, they may be supplied at the author’s discretion.

Parts of the Manuscript

Manuscripts can be uploaded either as a single document (containing the main text, tables and figures), or with figures and tables provided as separate files. Should your manuscript reach revision stage, figures and tables must be provided as separate files. The main manuscript file can be submitted in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) format.

Main Text File

Your main document file should include:

A short informative title containing the major key words. The title should not contain abbreviations;

The full names of the authors with institutional affiliations where the work was conducted, with a footnote for the author’s present address if different from where the work was conducted;

Acknowledgments;

Abstract structured (intro/methods/results/conclusion) or unstructured;

Up to seven keywords;

Main body: formatted as introduction, materials & methods, results, discussion, conclusion

References;

Tables (each table complete with title and footnotes);

Figures: Figure legends must be added beneath each individual image during upload AND as a complete list in the text;

Appendices (if relevant)

Figures and supporting information should be supplied as separate files.

Authorship

Please refer to the journal’s authorship policy the Editorial Policies and Ethical Considerations section for details on eligibility for author listing.

Acknowledgments

Contributions from anyone who does not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed, with permission from the contributor, in an Acknowledgments section. Financial and material support should also be mentioned. Thanks to anonymous reviewers are not appropriate.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Authors will be asked to provide a conflict of interest statement during the submission process. For details on what to include in this section, see the section ‘Conflict of Interest’ in the Editorial Policies and Ethical Considerations section below. Submitting authors should ensure they liaise with all co-authors to confirm agreement with the final statement.

Abstract

The abstract is limited to 200 words in length and should not contain abbreviations or references. The abstract should be organized according to the content of the paper.

For Original Research Articles the abstract should be organized with aim, materials and methods, results and conclusions.

For clinical trials, it is encouraged that the abstract finish with the clinical trial registration number on a free public database such as clinicaltrials.gov.

Keywords

Please provide 1-5 keywords. When appropriate keywords are available, they should be taken from those recommended by the US National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) browser list at www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh. Authors may add specific keywords.

Main Text

All manuscripts should emphasize clarity and brevity. Authors should pay special attention to the presentation of their findings so that they may be communicated clearly. Technical jargon should be avoided as much as possible and be clearly explained where its use is unavoidable.

Clinical Relevance

This section is aimed at giving clinicians a reading light to put the present research in perspective. It should be no more than 100 words and should not be a repetition of the abstract. It should provide a clear and concise explanation of the rationale for the study, of what was known before and of how the present results advance knowledge of this field. If appropriate, it may also contain suggestions for clinical practice.

It should be structured with the following headings: Scientific rationale for study; Principal findings; Practical implications.

Authors should pay particular attention to this text as it will be published in a highlighted box within their manuscript; ideally, reading this section should leave clinicians wishing to learn more about the topic and encourage them to read the full article.

……

更多详情：

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/1600051x/homepage/forauthors.html