1、投稿方式：在线投稿。

2、刊内网址（202506期）：

https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-ecotechnology

自动跳转至：

https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/environmental-science-and-ecotechnology

https://www.editorialmanager.com/ese/default.aspx（投稿）

3、刊内电话：010-62210689

4、刊内邮箱：ese@chinacses.org

5、出刊日期：双月刊，逢单月出版。

6、官方微信公众号：ESE期刊

2026年1月16日星期五

Guide for authors

【官网信息】

Before you begin

Your paper your way

We

now differentiate between the requirements for new and revised

submissions. You may choose to submit your manuscript as a single Word

or PDF file to be used in the refereeing process. Only when your paper

is at the revision stage, will you be requested to put your paper in to a

'correct format' for acceptance and provide the items required for the

publication of your article.

To find out more, please visit the Preparation section below.

Types of article

1.

Editorial articles are published by the Editor-in-Chief or other

Editors, members of the Editorial Board or invited Guest Editors. These

focus attention on news, policies, opinions, contemporary important

issues, and are designed to stimulate debate and discussion.

2.

Research Reviews represent articles that distill recent developments

and discuss trends in a particular field of research. They may be of a

broader nature than Original Research Articles, providing accounts of

specific fields of interest in relevant research areas related to our

Aims and Scope. Authors are encouraged to write in a clear and simple

manner so that the article is understandable to readers from a broad

cross-section of disciplines. On average, a text length (excluding

references) of approximately 8000 words is advised, and brevity is

encouraged.

3.

Original Research Articles are up-to-date, original papers that present

developments in the field of environmental science and ecotechnology.

Informative abstracts are required, and articles must be fully

referenced. Criteria for publication are weighted toward scientific

quality and environmental significance. The manuscript will be evaluated

on the basis of its conciseness, clarity, and presentation. The work

will be assessed according to its originality, scientific merit, and

experimental design. Poorly written manuscripts will be returned to the

authors with a request to improve the quality of the paper prior to peer

review. A text length (excluding references) of approximately 4000-8000

words is advised, and brevity is encouraged.

4.

Short communications will be accepted for the early communication of

important and original advances. Such accounts may be of a preliminary

nature but should always be complete and should not exceed the

equivalent of 3000 words, including figures and tables.

5.

Perspectives are short papers addressing a key, often emerging,

research area. They should balance the personal view of the author and a

reasoned discussion of recent results of great importance. While they

often examine the evolution of the field, they are not meant as a mini

review, but as a scholarly discussion that helps to identify new trends

and developments in a given field. Perspective manuscripts should

contain no more than 3000 words, up to three figures, and 60 references.

6.

Commentary articles discuss issues of particular significance to the

field of environmental science and ecotechnology. Commentary articles

may include highlights of significant papers, in the current issue of

Environmental Science & Ecotechnology or elsewhere, or comprise

poignant opinions, responses to previously published items, or other

timely information or comment. Commentary articles may be either

solicited by the Editors or offered as an unsolicited submission. No

abstract is required for commentary articles. The main body of the text

should not exceed 1500 words with a maximum of 3 tables or figures plus

maximum of 10 references.

7.

Short Correspondence is a forum for readers' reactions on brief insight

into any subject concerning environment and ecology. A short

correspondence is not peer-reviewed and so should not contain primary

research data. A short correspondence should contain no longer than 300

words with no more than five references and without any figures or

tables. The maximum number of the authors of a short correspondence is

four. It is submitted via e-mail to ese@chinacses.org only. Authors'

names, postal and e-mail address, and current telephone contact

information should be supplied in submissions.

Contact details for submission

All

manuscripts should be submitted electronically through Editorial

Manager https://www.editorialmanager.com/ese/default.aspx. If you are

not able to submit your paper electronically, please contact the ESE

Editorial Office (ese@chinacses.org) for further instructions.

Submission checklist

You

can use this list to carry out a final check of your submission before

you send it to the journal for review. Please check the relevant section

in this Guide for Authors for more details.

Ensure that the following items are present:

One author has been designated as the corresponding author with contact details:

E-mail address

Full postal address

All necessary files have been uploaded:

Manuscript

Include keywords

All figures (include relevant captions)

All tables (including titles, description, footnotes)

Ensure

all figure and table citations in the text match the files provided;

Indicate clearly if color should be used for any figures in print

Graphical Abstracts / Highlights files (where applicable)

Supplemental files (where applicable)

Further considerations:

Manuscript has been 'spell checked' and 'grammar checked'

All references mentioned in the Reference List are cited in the text, and vice versa

Permission has been obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including the Internet)

A competing interests statement is provided, even if the authors have no competing interests to declare

Journal policies detailed in this guide have been reviewed

For further information, visit our Support Center.

Ethics in publishing

Please see our information on Ethics in publishing.

Declaration of competing interest

All

authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with

other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence

(bias) their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include

employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert

testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other

funding. Authors should complete the declaration of competing interest

statement using this template and upload to the submission system at the

Attach/Upload Files step. Note: Please do not convert the .docx

template to another file type. Author signatures are not required. If

there are no interests to declare, please choose the first option in the

template. More information

Declaration of generative AI in scientific writing

Authors must declare the use of generative AI in the manuscript preparation process upon submission of the paper.

Elsevier

recognizes the potential of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies

(“AI Tools”), when used responsibly, to help researchers work

efficiently, gain critical insights fast and achieve better outcomes.

Increasingly, these tools, including AI agents and deep research tools,

are helping researchers to synthesize complex literature, provide an

overview of a field or research question, identify research gaps,

generate ideas, and provide tailored support for tasks such as content

organization and improving language and readability.

Authors

preparing a manuscript for an Elsevier journal can use AI Tools to

support them. However, these tools must never be used as a substitute

for human critical thinking, expertise and evaluation. AI technology

should always be applied with human oversight and control.

Ultimately, authors are responsible and accountable for the contents of their work. This includes accountability for:

Carefully

reviewing and verifying the accuracy, comprehensiveness, and

impartiality of all AI-generated output (including checking the sources,

as AI-generated references can be incorrect or fabricated).

Editing

and adapting all material thoroughly to ensure the manuscript

represents the author’s authentic and original contribution and reflects

their own analysis, interpretation, insights and ideas.

Ensuring

the use of any tools or sources, AI-based or otherwise, is made clear

and transparent to readers. If AI Tools have been used, we require a

disclosure statement upon submission; please see example below.

Ensuring

the manuscript is developed in a way that safeguards data privacy,

intellectual property and other rights, by checking the terms and

conditions of any AI tool that is used.

Finally,

authors must not list or cite AI Tools as an author or co-author on the

manuscript since authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can

only be attributed to, and performed by, humans.

The

use of AI Tools in the manuscript preparation process must be declared

by adding a statement at the end of the manuscript when the paper is

first submitted. The statement will appear in the published work and

should be placed in a new section before the references list.

An example:

Title of new section: Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the manuscript preparation process.

Statement:

During the preparation of this work the author(s) used [NAME OF TOOL /

SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the

author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full

responsibility for the content of the published article.

The

declaration does not apply to the use of basic tools, such as tools

used to check grammar, spelling and references. If you have nothing to

disclose, you do not need to add a statement.

Please

read Elsevier’s author policy on the use of generative AI and

AI-assisted technologies, which can be found in our generative AI

policies for journals.

Please

note: to protect authors’ rights and the confidentiality of their

research, this journal does not currently allow the use of generative AI

or AI-assisted technologies such as ChatGPT or similar services by

reviewers or editors in the peer review and manuscript evaluation

process, as is stated in our generative AI policies for journals. We are

actively evaluating compliant AI Tools and may revise this policy in

the future.

Submission declaration and verification

Submission

of an article implies that the work described has not been published

previously (except in the form of an abstract, a published lecture or

academic thesis, see 'Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication' for

more information), that it is not under consideration for publication

elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly

or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried

out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the

same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically

without the written consent of the copyright-holder. To verify

compliance, your article may be checked by Crossref Similarity Check and

other originality or duplicate checking software.

Preprints

Please

note that preprints can be shared anywhere at any time, in line with

Elsevier's sharing policy. Sharing your preprints e.g. on a preprint

server will not count as prior publication (see 'Multiple, redundant or

concurrent publication' for more information).

Use of inclusive language

Inclusive

language acknowledges diversity, conveys respect to all people, is

sensitive to differences, and promotes equal opportunities. Content

should make no assumptions about the beliefs or commitments of any

reader; contain nothing which might imply that one individual is

superior to another on the grounds of age, gender, race, ethnicity,

culture, sexual orientation, disability or health condition; and use

inclusive language throughout. Authors should ensure that writing is

free from bias, stereotypes, slang, reference to dominant culture and/or

cultural assumptions. We advise to seek gender neutrality by using

plural nouns ("clinicians, patients/clients") as default/wherever

possible to avoid using "he, she," or "he/she." We recommend avoiding

the use of descriptors that refer to personal attributes such as age,

gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability or

health condition unless they are relevant and valid. When coding

terminology is used, we recommend to avoid offensive or exclusionary

terms such as "master", "slave", "blacklist" and "whitelist". We suggest

using alternatives that are more appropriate and (self-) explanatory

such as "primary", "secondary", "blocklist" and "allowlist". These

guidelines are meant as a point of reference to help identify

appropriate language but are by no means exhaustive or definitive.

Reporting sex- and gender-based analyses

Reporting guidance

For

research involving or pertaining to humans, animals or eukaryotic

cells, investigators should integrate sex and gender-based analyses

(SGBA) into their research design according to funder/sponsor

requirements and best practices within a field. Authors should address

the sex and/or gender dimensions of their research in their article. In

cases where they cannot, they should discuss this as a limitation to

their research's generalizability. Importantly, authors should

explicitly state what definitions of sex and/or gender they are applying

to enhance the precision, rigor and reproducibility of their research

and to avoid ambiguity or conflation of terms and the constructs to

which they refer (see Definitions section below). Authors can refer to

the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines and the SAGER

guidelines checklist. These offer systematic approaches to the use and

editorial review of sex and gender information in study design, data

analysis, outcome reporting and research interpretation - however,

please note there is no single, universally agreed-upon set of

guidelines for defining sex and gender.

Definitions

Sex

generally refers to a set of biological attributes that are associated

with physical and physiological features (e.g., chromosomal genotype,

hormonal levels, internal and external anatomy). A binary sex

categorization (male/female) is usually designated at birth ("sex

assigned at birth"), most often based solely on the visible external

anatomy of a newborn. Gender generally refers to socially constructed

roles, behaviors, and identities of women, men and gender-diverse people

that occur in a historical and cultural context and may vary across

societies and over time. Gender influences how people view themselves

and each other, how they behave and interact and how power is

distributed in society. Sex and gender are often incorrectly portrayed

as binary (female/male or woman/man) and unchanging whereas these

constructs actually exist along a spectrum and include additional sex

categorizations and gender identities such as people who are

intersex/have differences of sex development (DSD) or identify as

non-binary. Moreover, the terms "sex" and "gender" can be

ambiguous--thus it is important for authors to define the manner in

which they are used. In addition to this definition guidance and the

SAGER guidelines, the resources on this page offer further insight

around sex and gender in research studies.

Author contributions

For

transparency, we require corresponding authors to provide co-author

contributions to the manuscript using the relevant CRediT roles. The

CRediT taxonomy includes 14 different roles describing each

contributor's specific contribution to the scholarly output. The roles

are: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding

acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration;

Resources; Software; Supervision; Validation; Visualization;

Roles/Writing - original draft; and Writing - review & editing. Note

that not all roles may apply to every manuscript, and authors may have

contributed through multiple roles. More details and an example.

Changes to authorship

Authors

are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before

submitting their manuscript and provide the definitive list of authors

at the time of the original submission. A confirmation letter will be

sent to ALL AUTHORS to inform that the action of submission has been

made. Any controversial response by any coauthor may lead to

reconsideration of the manuscript by the editorial office. Any addition,

deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship list should

be made only before the manuscript has been accepted and only if

approved by the editor. To request such a change, the Editor must

receive the following from the corresponding author: (a) the reason for

the change in author list and (b) written confirmation (e-mail, letter)

from all authors that they agree with the addition, removal or

rearrangement. In the case of addition or removal of authors, this

includes confirmation from the author being added or removed.

Only

in exceptional circumstances will the Editor consider the addition,

deletion or rearrangement of authors after the manuscript has been

accepted. While the editor considers the request, the publication of the

manuscript will be suspended. If the manuscript has already been

published in an online issue, any requests approved by the Editor will

result in a corrigendum.

......

更多详见：

https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/environmental-science-and-ecotechnology/publish/guide-for-authors